Hitherto, humanity owes its success in technological science, in its classical approach, one may wonder whether this progress would not have happened differently. In other words, under multiple errors caused by the progress in the name of objectivity and rationality, it was not possible to build a civilization that is not only powerful in the technology but is also very advanced in other areas such as humanities, social and ecological. Such questioning leads to the following question: The man has it not been betrayed by the illusion of holding a certain truth through a scientific approach that has finally revealed its limits? Modern man is confronted with a reality he can not explain using conventional scientific tools at his disposal. Since these tools are unable to identify the many facets of this reality. A universe where we find meaning and nonsense, truth and the truth against a world where the logical approach contradicts the empirical approach.
The segmentation of our disciplines, subdisciplines and specializations, the non-communication of science among them, are signs of a reductive way of thinking and mutilated. It is therefore not surprising that simplistic thinking and communicates only with itself is unable to grasp reality more and more complex in which we live today. Indeed, the paradigm of complexity appears to be the most appropriate approach, able to bear the contradictions of the world around us, to understand its antagonisms, accept differences, to provide a look dialogic exceed silos and understand the various interactions of different actors contained in our universe.